Model comparison

Hy4 preview vs Solar Pro4

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index. Solar Pro4 costs 2.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Hy4 preview Tencent

45.3

Rank #73 Reported

Solar Pro4 Upstage

42.1

Rank #121 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Hy4 preview scores higher in 3 categories and Solar Pro4 in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 55.7 to 38.8.
  • Solar Pro4 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.83 / $2.50 for Hy4 preview.
  • Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 524K.
  • Hy4 preview has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hy4 preview and Solar Pro4 specifications
Hy4 previewSolar Pro4
ProviderTencentUpstage
Noometry Index45.342.1
Released2026-08-282026-08-06
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1.05M524K
Max output64K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.83$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$2.50$1.20
Results tracked318

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewSolar Pro4
LMArena WebDev16321371
LMArena Coding—1437

Reasoning Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewSolar Pro4
NYT Connections (extended)68.2%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1399

Math Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewSolar Pro4
ProofBench75%—
LMArena Math—1416

Knowledge Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewSolar Pro4
LMArena Expert—1427

Multilingual Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewSolar Pro4
LMArena Non-English—1361
LMArena Chinese—1415
LMArena French—1397
LMArena German—1364
LMArena Japanese—1309
LMArena Korean—1382
LMArena Russian—1360
LMArena Spanish—1401

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewSolar Pro4
LMArena Instruction Following—1377

Long Context Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewSolar Pro4
LMArena Longer Query—1381

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewSolar Pro4
LMArena Text—1386
LMArena Creative Writing—1316
LMArena Multi-Turn—1385

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy4 preview better than Solar Pro4?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index. Solar Pro4 costs 2.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Hy4 preview or Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview lists at $0.83 and $2.50.

Is Hy4 preview or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 524K.

How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Solar Pro4 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper