Model comparison
Granite 4.0 H Small vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 51.9 to 31.4.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 48.5 |
| Released | — | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1249 | 1504 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1637 |
| SciCode | — | 51.3% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1240 | 1482 |
| CritPt | — | 12% |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1247 | 1468 |
| ProofBench | — | 63% |
| Omni-MATH | 29.6% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1251 | 1501 |
| MMLU-Pro | 56.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1249 | 1511 |
| LMArena Russian | 1201 | 1409 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1258 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | — | 1475 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1222 | 1463 |
| IFEval | 89% | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1242 | 1463 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1241 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1211 | 1400 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1242 | 1451 |
| WildBench | 73.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.0 H Small or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.