Model comparison
Granite 4.0 H Small vs Phi-3.5-MoE
Granite 4.0 H Small has enough public results to be ranked (#214); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 H Small | Phi-3.5-MoE | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | — |
| Released | — | 2024-08-17 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1249 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1240 | — |
| PIQA | — | 88.6% |
Math Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 29.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1247 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 88.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 56.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1251 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 84.6% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1249 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1201 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1258 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 89% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1222 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1242 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1241 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1211 | — |
| WildBench | 73.9% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1242 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than Phi-3.5-MoE?
Granite 4.0 H Small has enough public results to be ranked (#214); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and Phi-3.5-MoE share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-MoE has 3.