Model comparison
Inkling-Small vs MiMo-V2-Flash
Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 3.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Inkling-Small's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling-Small scores higher in 6 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Inkling-Small leads 38.6 to 24.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 48.7% for Inkling-Small and 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.45 / $1.20 for Inkling-Small.
- Inkling-Small accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 262K.
Side by side
| Inkling-Small | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinking Machines Lab | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 46.5 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2026-07-15 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 524K | 262K |
| Max output | 1.05M | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.45 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 33 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1409 | 1330 |
| SciCode | 48.7% | 25.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1451 | 1443 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
Reasoning Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 8.3% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1423 | 1420 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 40.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 84% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 18% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.15 | — |
Math Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1459 | 1396 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 46.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 90% | — |
| ProofBench | 6% | — |
Knowledge Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1442 | 1425 |
| GPQA Diamond | 88.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 19.1% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62), MiMo-V2-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1235 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1402 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1462 |
| LMArena French | 1436 | 1429 |
| LMArena German | 1405 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1428 | 1420 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1399 | 1392 |
Long Context Too close to call
Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1401 | 1409 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1414 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1418 | 1404 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1491 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Inkling-Small better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 3.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Inkling-Small's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Inkling-Small or MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Inkling-Small lists at $0.45 and $1.20.
Is Inkling-Small or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Inkling-Small does, with 524K tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Inkling-Small and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling-Small has 33 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.