Model comparison
Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling-Small scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Inkling-Small leads 38.6 to 31.1.
- Inkling-Small is cheaper at $0.45 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $2 for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct.
- Inkling-Small accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| Inkling-Small | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Thinking Machines Lab | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.5 | 43.0 |
| Released | 2026-07-15 | 2025-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 524K | 131K |
| Max output | 1.05M | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.45 | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | $2 |
| Results tracked | 33 | 25 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 42.5 (#98)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1451 | 1440 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1409 | — |
| SciCode | 48.7% | — |
Reasoning Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 31.1 (#81)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1423 | 1428 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 40.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 66.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 84% | — |
| CritPt | 8.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 18% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.15 | — |
Math Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 38.8 (#126)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1459 | 1440 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 46.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 90% | — |
| ProofBench | 6% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 46.7% |
Knowledge Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.8 (#106)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1442 | 1417 |
| GPQA Diamond | 88.5% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 19.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 63% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1235 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.1 (#93)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1402 | 1407 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1460 |
| LMArena French | 1436 | 1413 |
| LMArena German | 1405 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | 1395 |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | 1364 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1404 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1428 | 1435 |
Instruction Following Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 70.8 (#159)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1399 | 1389 |
| IFEval | — | 81% |
Long Context Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#223)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1401 | 1403 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 55.6% |
Writing & Preference Inkling-Small leads
Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.0 (#121)
| Benchmark | Inkling-Small | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1414 | 1417 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1334 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1418 | 1416 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1491 | — |
| WildBench | — | 80.7% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Inkling-Small better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?
Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Inkling-Small or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?
Inkling-Small is cheaper. It lists at $0.45 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct lists at $0.50 and $2.
Is Inkling-Small or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?
Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 42.5 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Inkling-Small does, with 524K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Inkling-Small and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling-Small has 33 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.