Model comparison

Inkling-Small vs Sonar

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 38.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Inkling-Small Thinking Machines Lab

46.5

Rank #63 Confirmed

Sonar Perplexity

38.5

Rank #187 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Inkling-Small leads 38.6 to 21.1.
  • Inkling-Small is cheaper at $0.45 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $1 for Sonar.
  • Inkling-Small accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 128K.
  • Inkling-Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Inkling-Small and Sonar specifications
Inkling-SmallSonar
ProviderThinking Machines LabPerplexity
Noometry Index46.538.5
Released2026-07-152024-01-01
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window524K128K
Max output1.05M4K
Input $ / M tokens$0.45$1
Output $ / M tokens$1.20$1
Results tracked337

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85), Sonar: 35.7 (#221)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallSonar
LMArena WebDev1409—
SciCode48.7%—
LiveBench Coding—35.1%
LMArena Coding1451—

Reasoning Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63), Sonar: 21.1 (#227)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallSonar
ARC-AGI-240.1%—
ARC-AGI-184%—
CritPt8.3%—
Chess Puzzles18%—
LiveBench Reasoning—46.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1423—
Mystery Game Puzzles6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—37.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index150.15—
LiveBench—46.9%

Math Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77), Sonar: 33.7 (#200)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallSonar
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)46.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202590%—
ProofBench6%—
LiveBench Math—41.6%
LMArena Math1459—

Knowledge Not comparable

Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77), Sonar: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallSonar
GPQA Diamond88.5%—
SimpleQA Verified19.1%—
LMArena Expert1442—

Multimodal Not comparable

Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62), Sonar: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallSonar
LMArena Vision1235—

Multilingual Not comparable

Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104), Sonar: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallSonar
LMArena Non-English1402—
LMArena Chinese1465—
LMArena French1436—
LMArena German1405—
LMArena Japanese1405—
LMArena Korean1363—
LMArena Russian1391—
LMArena Spanish1428—

Instruction Following Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114), Sonar: 71.4 (#150)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallSonar
LiveBench Instruction Following—76.2%
LMArena Instruction Following1399—

Long Context Not comparable

Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118), Sonar: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallSonar
LMArena Longer Query1401—

Writing & Preference Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107), Sonar: 52.6 (#167)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallSonar
LMArena Text1414—
LMArena Creative Writing1331—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1491—
LMArena Multi-Turn1418—
LiveBench Language—44.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is Inkling-Small better than Sonar?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 38.5 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Inkling-Small or Sonar?

Inkling-Small is cheaper. It lists at $0.45 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Sonar lists at $1 and $1.

Is Inkling-Small or Sonar better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 35.7 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Inkling-Small does, with 524K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Inkling-Small and Sonar share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling-Small has 33 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper