Model comparison

Inkling vs Kimi K2.5 Instant

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Inkling Thinking Machines Lab

44.1

Rank #75 Confirmed

Kimi K2.5 Instant Moonshot AI

42.9

Rank #92 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling scores higher in 5 categories and Kimi K2.5 Instant in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling leads 55.2 to 39.5.

Side by side

Inkling and Kimi K2.5 Instant specifications
InklingKimi K2.5 Instant
ProviderThinking Machines LabMoonshot AI
Noometry Index44.142.9
Released2026-07-15—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window66K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.87—
Output $ / M tokens$4.68—
Results tracked4118

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Inkling: 34.1 (#229), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.3 (#95)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena WebDev14121404
LMArena Coding14631483
FrontierCode14%—
FrontierSWE4.1%—
SciCode47%—
WeirdML32.3%—
ALE-Bench946—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Inkling: 29.5 (#76), Kimi K2.5 Instant: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingKimi K2.5 Instant
APEX-Agents33.8%—
τ²-bench Banking25%—

Reasoning Inkling leads

Inkling: 40.6 (#48), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 28.5 (#88)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Hard Prompts14521443
ARC-AGI-236.5%—
SimpleBench50%—
ARC-AGI-179.5%—
CritPt5.4%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
DTBench87.5%—
LMCA37.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index148.6—

Math Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Inkling: 31.2 (#198), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 36.6 (#105)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Math14821443
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)33.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 44.9%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench0%—

Knowledge Inkling leads

Inkling: 55.2 (#44), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#121)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Expert14681438
GPQA Diamond88.3%—
SimpleQA Verified40.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Inkling: —, Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#47)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Vision—1254

Multilingual Inkling leads

Inkling: 54.2 (#49), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.2 (#89)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Non-English14341406
LMArena Chinese14951450
LMArena French14531403
LMArena German14561413
LMArena Korean14011378
LMArena Russian14301404
LMArena Spanish14421448
LMArena Japanese1428—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Inkling: 75.3 (#65), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.5 (#61)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Instruction Following14271430

Long Context Too close to call

Inkling: 43.9 (#79), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.8 (#82)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Longer Query14361435

Writing & Preference Inkling leads

Inkling: 65.5 (#48), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.8 (#91)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Text14431420
LMArena Creative Writing13901379
LMArena Multi-Turn14361427
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1611—
EQ-Bench 41226—

Frequently asked questions

Is Inkling better than Kimi K2.5 Instant?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Inkling or Kimi K2.5 Instant better for coding?

Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Inkling and Kimi K2.5 Instant share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling has 41 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper