Model comparison

Inkling vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

Inkling and Qwen3.5 Max Preview score almost the same on the Noometry Index (44.1 vs 44.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Inkling Thinking Machines Lab

44.1

Rank #75 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

44.7

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling leads 55.2 to 41.1.
  • Inkling has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Inkling and Qwen3.5 Max Preview specifications
InklingQwen3.5 Max Preview
ProviderThinking Machines LabAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index44.144.7
Released2026-07-15—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window66K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.87—
Output $ / M tokens$4.68—
Results tracked4117

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Inkling: 34.1 (#229), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 43.4 (#79)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Coding14631488
FrontierCode14%—
LMArena WebDev1412—
FrontierSWE4.1%—
SciCode47%—
WeirdML32.3%—
ALE-Bench946—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Inkling: 29.5 (#76), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen3.5 Max Preview
APEX-Agents33.8%—
τ²-bench Banking25%—

Reasoning Inkling leads

Inkling: 40.6 (#48), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 29.6 (#81)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts14521483
ARC-AGI-236.5%—
SimpleBench50%—
ARC-AGI-179.5%—
CritPt5.4%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
DTBench87.5%—
LMCA37.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index148.6—

Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Inkling: 31.2 (#198), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 37.3 (#99)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Math14821473
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)33.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 44.9%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench0%—

Knowledge Inkling leads

Inkling: 55.2 (#44), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.1 (#104)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Expert14681489
GPQA Diamond88.3%—
SimpleQA Verified40.3%—

Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Inkling: 54.2 (#49), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.4 (#21)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English14341465
LMArena Chinese14951534
LMArena French14531483
LMArena German14561487
LMArena Japanese14281497
LMArena Korean14011438
LMArena Russian14301472
LMArena Spanish14421470

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Inkling: 75.3 (#65), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.2 (#28)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following14271467

Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Inkling: 43.9 (#79), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#44)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query14361477

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Inkling: 65.5 (#48), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.1 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkInklingQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Text14431471
LMArena Creative Writing13901464
LMArena Multi-Turn14361478
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1611—
EQ-Bench 41226—

Frequently asked questions

Is Inkling better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Inkling and Qwen3.5 Max Preview score almost the same on the Noometry Index (44.1 vs 44.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Inkling or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Inkling and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling has 41 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper