Model comparison

Kimi K2.5 Instant vs Qwen3-30B-A3B

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 38.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2.5 Instant Moonshot AI

43.6

Rank #89 Confirmed

Qwen3-30B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

38.9

Rank #179 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen3-30B-A3B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 43.9 to 31.0.

Side by side

Kimi K2.5 Instant and Qwen3-30B-A3B specifications
Kimi K2.5 InstantQwen3-30B-A3B
ProviderMoonshot AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.638.9
Released—2025-04-28
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—41K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.12
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked1832

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.5 (#194)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Coding14841416
LMArena WebDev1404—
SciCode—33.3%
WeirdML—29.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K2.5 Instant: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 29.8 (#82)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3-30B-A3B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—41.4%

Reasoning Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 22.2 (#204)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Hard Prompts14431398
Kagi LLM Benchmark—54.9%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—8%
DTBench—69.3%
LMCA—22.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—139.63

Math Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.4 (#157)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Math14421394
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—47.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—70.3%

Knowledge Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 41.8 (#105)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Expert14401396
GPQA Diamond—70.1%
Confabulations—12.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50), Qwen3-30B-A3B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Vision1254—

Multilingual Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 49.5 (#132)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Non-English14061372
LMArena Chinese14491433
LMArena French14031418
LMArena German14131380
LMArena Korean13781331
LMArena Russian14041370
LMArena Spanish14471404
LMArena Japanese—1337

Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 72.0 (#142)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Instruction Following14301363

Long Context Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 31.0 (#283)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Longer Query14351379
Fiction.LiveBench—40.6%

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 55.6 (#143)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.5 InstantQwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Text14201384
LMArena Creative Writing13811317
LMArena Multi-Turn14271378
Short-Story Creative Writing—75.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2.5 Instant better than Qwen3-30B-A3B?

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 38.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K2.5 Instant or Qwen3-30B-A3B better for coding?

Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 37.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.5 Instant and Qwen3-30B-A3B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-30B-A3B has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper