Model comparison
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 53.6 to 26.3.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.7 Code | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 29.1 |
| Released | 2026-06-12 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 262K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.95 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.4 (#92), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.3 (#307)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | — |
| SciCode | 47.5% | — |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29.6% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1040 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: 23.9 (#115), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 38.2 (#56), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 18.7 (#254)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | — |
| CritPt | 10% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1028 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.01 | — |
Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.6 (#39), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 29.2 (#220)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1089 |
Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.6 (#51), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.3 (#251)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 984 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.4 (#280)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1016 |
| LMArena French | — | 1038 |
| LMArena German | — | 1006 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 899 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 856 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1004 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1058 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 52.1 (#289)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1023 |
Long Context Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.3 (#284)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 996 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.3 (#296)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 989 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?
Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2.7 Code or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?
Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.