Model comparison

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) vs Mistral Small

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small costs 3.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)'s lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) Moonshot AI

41.2

Rank #140 Confirmed

Mistral Small Mistral AI

33.4

Rank #243 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher in 9 categories and Mistral Small in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads 42.7 to 16.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 64.4% for Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and 37.8% for Mistral Small.
  • Mistral Small is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $0.57 / $2.30 for Kimi K2 (Jul 2025).

Side by side

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Mistral Small specifications
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)Mistral Small
ProviderMoonshot AIMistral AI
Noometry Index41.233.4
Released2025-07-122024-02-26
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K262K
Max output262K256K
Input $ / M tokens$0.57$0.15
Output $ / M tokens$2.30$0.60
Results tracked4239

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.4 (#102), Mistral Small: 34.0 (#247)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Mistral Small
LMArena Coding13991362
ALE-Bench597.5497.62
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)63.4%—
Aider Polyglot59.1%—
SciCode—26.5%
GSO4.9%—
WeirdML42.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—36.1%
LiveBench Coding—36.2%
BigCodeBench Complete—46.6%

Agentic & Tool Use Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.4 (#64), Mistral Small: 28.1 (#93)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Mistral Small
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard59.1%37.1%
Terminal-Bench35.7%—
METR Time Horizons59.2%—

Reasoning Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 23.3 (#179), Mistral Small: 19.8 (#250)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Mistral Small
Kagi LLM Benchmark64.4%37.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts13841335
SimpleBench26.3%—
CritPt—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—44.8%
DTBench—70.9%
LiveBench Data Analysis—53.7%
LMCA—20.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index146.01—
ForecastBench60.2—
LiveBench—44%

Math Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.7 (#83), Mistral Small: 16.4 (#293)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Mistral Small
LMArena Math13971341
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—5.8%
Omni-MATH65.4%—
LiveBench Math—39.9%
MATH Level 5—46.8%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)21.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 37.3 (#157), Mistral Small: 31.0 (#222)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Mistral Small
Vectara Hallucination Rate17.9%5.1%
LMArena Expert13651291
GPQA Diamond—47.5%
MMLU-Pro81.9%—
Confabulations20.4%—
GPQA (HELM)65.3%—
MMLU—68.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): —, Mistral Small: 33.5 (#96)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Mistral Small
LMArena Vision—1142

Multilingual Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.6 (#130), Mistral Small: 45.5 (#169)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Mistral Small
LMArena Non-English13721315
LMArena Chinese14151340
LMArena French13791337
LMArena German13871340
LMArena Japanese13491275
LMArena Korean13251259
LMArena Russian13851324
LMArena Spanish13861346

Instruction Following Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.1 (#156), Mistral Small: 66.4 (#209)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Mistral Small
LMArena Instruction Following13481310
LiveBench Instruction Following—63.7%
IFEval85%—

Long Context Too close to call

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#145), Mistral Small: 40.4 (#156)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Mistral Small
LMArena Longer Query13531327
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—
CL-bench17.6%—

Writing & Preference Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.3 (#78), Mistral Small: 52.5 (#171)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Mistral Small
LMArena Text13801338
LMArena Creative Writing13501305
LMArena Multi-Turn13711344
Short-Story Creative Writing85.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1666—
WildBench86.2%—
LiveBench Language—30.5%

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better than Mistral Small?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small costs 3.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)'s lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) or Mistral Small?

Mistral Small is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) lists at $0.57 and $2.30.

Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) or Mistral Small better for coding?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Mistral Small share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper