Model comparison
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) vs Qwen1.5-110B
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads 62.5 to 38.1.
Side by side
| Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen1.5-110B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.9 | 33.6 |
| Released | 2025-07-12 | 2024-04-25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 262K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.57 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.30 | — |
| Results tracked | 42 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 43.1 (#83), Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1399 | 1184 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 63.4% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 59.1% | — |
| GSO | 4.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 42.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |
| ALE-Bench | 597.5 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.2 (#59), Qwen1.5-110B: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 35.7% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 59.1% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 59.2% | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 22.7 (#173), Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1384 | 1168 |
| ForecastBench | 60.2 | 57.7 |
| SimpleBench | 26.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 64.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.02 | — |
Math Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 40.1 (#81), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1185 |
| Omni-MATH | 65.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 21.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 36.9 (#153), Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1363 | 1144 |
| MMLU-Pro | 81.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 20.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 17.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65.3% | — |
Multilingual Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.8 (#125), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1416 | 1206 |
| LMArena French | 1379 | 1150 |
| LMArena German | 1386 | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1349 | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | 1324 | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | 1384 | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1383 | 1141 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.3 (#151), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1158 |
| IFEval | 85% | — |
Long Context Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#140), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1353 | 1157 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |
| CL-bench | 17.6% | — |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.5 (#76), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1380 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1349 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1371 | 1160 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 85.6% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1666 | — |
| WildBench | 86.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better than Qwen1.5-110B?
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Qwen1.5-110B share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.