Model comparison
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) vs Step 3.5 Flash
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Step 3.5 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.9 vs 41.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
StepFunSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher in 3 categories and Step 3.5 Flash in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads 62.5 to 59.0.
- Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.57 / $2.30 for Kimi K2 (Jul 2025).
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
Side by side
| Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Step 3.5 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 40.9 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2025-07-12 | 2026-01-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 256K |
| Max output | 262K | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.57 | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.30 | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 42 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 43.1 (#83), Step 3.5 Flash: 41.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1399 | 1436 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 63.4% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 59.1% | — |
| GSO | 4.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 42.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 597.5 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.2 (#59), Step 3.5 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 35.7% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 59.1% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 59.2% | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 22.7 (#173), Step 3.5 Flash: 21.2 (#202)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1384 | 1411 |
| SimpleBench | 26.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 64.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 28.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.02 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.2 | — |
Math Too close to call
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 40.1 (#81), Step 3.5 Flash: 40.6 (#77)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1408 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 66.8% |
| Omni-MATH | 65.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 21.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Step 3.5 Flash leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 36.9 (#153), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.0 (#127)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1363 | 1422 |
| MMLU-Pro | 81.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 20.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 17.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65.3% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.8 (#125), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | 1386 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1416 | 1448 |
| LMArena French | 1379 | 1421 |
| LMArena German | 1386 | 1404 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1349 | 1353 |
| LMArena Korean | 1324 | 1350 |
| LMArena Russian | 1384 | 1385 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1383 | 1419 |
Instruction Following Step 3.5 Flash leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.3 (#151), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.3 (#119)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1385 |
| IFEval | 85% | — |
Long Context Step 3.5 Flash leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#140), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#112)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1353 | 1402 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |
| CL-bench | 17.6% | — |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.5 (#76), Step 3.5 Flash: 59.0 (#108)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1380 | 1403 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1349 | 1357 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1371 | 1405 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 85.6% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1666 | — |
| WildBench | 86.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better than Step 3.5 Flash?
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Step 3.5 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.9 vs 41.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) or Step 3.5 Flash?
Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) lists at $0.57 and $2.30.
Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 41.7 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) does, with 262K tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Step 3.5 Flash share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.