Model comparison

Kimi K3 vs Llama 3.2 90B

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K3 Moonshot AI

59.5

Rank #15 Confirmed

Llama 3.2 90B Meta

27.5

Rank #331 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K3 scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K3 leads 74.2 to 11.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 97.2% for Kimi K3 and 2.6% for Llama 3.2 90B.

Side by side

Kimi K3 and Llama 3.2 90B specifications
Kimi K3Llama 3.2 90B
ProviderMoonshot AIMeta
Noometry Index59.527.5
Released2026-07-162024-09-24
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output1.05M—
Input $ / M tokens$3—
Output $ / M tokens$15—
Results tracked539

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Kimi K3: 61.0 (#10), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 3.2 90B
DeepSWE68.5%—
FrontierCode44.2%—
LMArena WebDev1654—
FrontierSWE25.9%—
SciCode59.5%—
WeirdML82.6%—
LMArena Coding1508—
ALE-Bench1,524—

Agentic & Tool Use Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 41.8 (#20), Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 3.2 90B
APEX-Agents50.6%—
τ²-bench Banking37.1%—
PostTrainBench32%—
BALROG—27.3%
GBAEval48.3%—
GDP.pdf19%—
Vending-Bench 25,165—

Reasoning Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 63.0 (#17), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 3.2 90B
Epoch Capabilities Index157.45125.5
ARC-AGI-260.4%—
SimpleBench60.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)93.6%—
ARC-AGI-194.5%—
CritPt23.4%—
Chess Puzzles39%—
EnigmaEval—0.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1496—
Mystery Game Puzzles26%—
DTBench91.2%—
LMCA52.7%—
Surface Evolver Bench95%—
ForecastBench61.1—

Math Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 74.2 (#16), Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 3.2 90B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%2.6%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)72.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 439%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions87.8%—
ProofBench87%—
LMArena Math1491—
MATH Level 5—39.4%

Knowledge Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 63.2 (#21), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 3.2 90B
GPQA Diamond93.1%41%
SimpleQA Verified50.6%—
LMArena Expert1521—
MMLU—80.3%

Multimodal Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 37.8 (#70), Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 3.2 90B
LMArena Vision—1000
GeoBench—52%
Blueprint-Bench 229.5%—
Furniture Assembly34.2%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Kimi K3: 56.3 (#21), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 3.2 90B
LMArena Non-English1466—
LMArena Chinese1529—
LMArena French1491—
LMArena German1488—
LMArena Japanese1487—
LMArena Korean1458—
LMArena Russian1482—
LMArena Spanish1472—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Kimi K3: 77.7 (#14), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 3.2 90B
LMArena Instruction Following1483—

Long Context Not comparable

Kimi K3: 45.8 (#29), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 3.2 90B
LMArena Longer Query1494—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Kimi K3: 76.6 (#4), Llama 3.2 90B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Llama 3.2 90B
LMArena Text1476—
LMArena Creative Writing1454—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2082—
EQ-Bench 41339—
LMArena Multi-Turn1488—

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K3 better than Llama 3.2 90B?

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K3 and Llama 3.2 90B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K3 has 53 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper