Model comparison

Kimi K3 vs Qwen2-72B

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K3 Moonshot AI

59.5

Rank #15 Confirmed

Qwen2-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.0

Rank #300 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K3 scores higher in 9 categories and Qwen2-72B in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K3 leads 74.2 to 30.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 82.6% for Kimi K3 and 11.3% for Qwen2-72B.

Side by side

Kimi K3 and Qwen2-72B specifications
Kimi K3Qwen2-72B
ProviderMoonshot AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index59.530.0
Released2026-07-162024-06-07
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output1.05M—
Input $ / M tokens$3—
Output $ / M tokens$15—
Results tracked5326

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 61.0 (#10), Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen2-72B
WeirdML82.6%11.3%
LMArena Coding15081196
DeepSWE68.5%—
FrontierCode44.2%—
LMArena WebDev1654—
FrontierSWE25.9%—
SciCode59.5%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—38.5%
BigCodeBench Complete—54%
ALE-Bench1,524—

Agentic & Tool Use Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 41.8 (#20), Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen2-72B
APEX-Agents50.6%—
TheAgentCompany—1.1%
τ²-bench Banking37.1%—
PostTrainBench32%—
GBAEval48.3%—
GDP.pdf19%—
METR Time Horizons—29.9%
Vending-Bench 25,165—

Reasoning Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 63.0 (#17), Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen2-72B
LMArena Hard Prompts14961191
Epoch Capabilities Index157.45125.28
ARC-AGI-260.4%—
SimpleBench60.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)93.6%—
ARC-AGI-194.5%—
CritPt23.4%—
Chess Puzzles39%—
Mystery Game Puzzles26%—
DTBench91.2%—
LMCA52.7%—
Surface Evolver Bench95%—
ForecastBench61.1—

Math Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 74.2 (#16), Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen2-72B
LMArena Math14911235
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)72.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 439%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions87.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench87%—
MATH Level 5—39.1%

Knowledge Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 63.2 (#21), Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen2-72B
GPQA Diamond93.1%40.8%
LMArena Expert15211171
SimpleQA Verified50.6%—
MMLU—82.4%

Multimodal Not comparable

Kimi K3: 37.8 (#70), Qwen2-72B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen2-72B
Blueprint-Bench 229.5%—
Furniture Assembly34.2%—

Multilingual Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 56.3 (#21), Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen2-72B
LMArena Non-English14661176
LMArena Chinese15291240
LMArena French14911170
LMArena German14881151
LMArena Japanese14871111
LMArena Korean14581083
LMArena Russian14821169
LMArena Spanish14721169

Instruction Following Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 77.7 (#14), Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen2-72B
LMArena Instruction Following14831181

Long Context Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 45.8 (#29), Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen2-72B
LMArena Longer Query14941192

Writing & Preference Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 76.6 (#4), Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen2-72B
LMArena Text14761203
LMArena Creative Writing14541181
LMArena Multi-Turn14881196
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2082—
EQ-Bench 41339—

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K3 better than Qwen2-72B?

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K3 or Qwen2-72B better for coding?

Kimi K3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 61.0 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K3 and Qwen2-72B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K3 has 53 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.

Related comparisons

Go deeper