Model comparison

Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-1.7B

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K3 Moonshot AI

59.5

Rank #15 Confirmed

Qwen3-1.7B Alibaba (Qwen)

26.6

Rank #336 Reported

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K3 scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3-1.7B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K3 leads 74.2 to 16.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 97.2% for Kimi K3 and 8.1% for Qwen3-1.7B.

Side by side

Kimi K3 and Qwen3-1.7B specifications
Kimi K3Qwen3-1.7B
ProviderMoonshot AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index59.526.6
Released2026-07-162025-04-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output1.05M—
Input $ / M tokens$3—
Output $ / M tokens$15—
Results tracked534

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Kimi K3: 61.0 (#10), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen3-1.7B
DeepSWE68.5%—
FrontierCode44.2%—
LMArena WebDev1654—
FrontierSWE25.9%—
SciCode59.5%—
WeirdML82.6%—
LMArena Coding1508—
ALE-Bench1,524—

Agentic & Tool Use Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 41.8 (#20), Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen3-1.7B
APEX-Agents50.6%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.4%
τ²-bench Banking37.1%—
PostTrainBench32%—
GBAEval48.3%—
GDP.pdf19%—
Vending-Bench 25,165—

Reasoning Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 63.0 (#17), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen3-1.7B
Chess Puzzles39%0%
ARC-AGI-260.4%—
SimpleBench60.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)93.6%—
ARC-AGI-194.5%—
CritPt23.4%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1496—
Mystery Game Puzzles26%—
DTBench91.2%—
LMCA52.7%—
Surface Evolver Bench95%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.45—
ForecastBench61.1—

Math Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 74.2 (#16), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen3-1.7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%8.1%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)72.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 439%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions87.8%—
ProofBench87%—
LMArena Math1491—

Knowledge Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 63.2 (#21), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen3-1.7B
GPQA Diamond93.1%38%
SimpleQA Verified50.6%—
LMArena Expert1521—

Multimodal Not comparable

Kimi K3: 37.8 (#70), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen3-1.7B
Blueprint-Bench 229.5%—
Furniture Assembly34.2%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Kimi K3: 56.3 (#21), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen3-1.7B
LMArena Non-English1466—
LMArena Chinese1529—
LMArena French1491—
LMArena German1488—
LMArena Japanese1487—
LMArena Korean1458—
LMArena Russian1482—
LMArena Spanish1472—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Kimi K3: 77.7 (#14), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen3-1.7B
LMArena Instruction Following1483—

Long Context Not comparable

Kimi K3: 45.8 (#29), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen3-1.7B
LMArena Longer Query1494—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Kimi K3: 76.6 (#4), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen3-1.7B
LMArena Text1476—
LMArena Creative Writing1454—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2082—
EQ-Bench 41339—
LMArena Multi-Turn1488—

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K3 better than Qwen3-1.7B?

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K3 and Qwen3-1.7B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K3 has 53 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.

Related comparisons

Go deeper