Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Poolside
NVIDIASummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads 37.5 to 21.1.
Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 36.7 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads
Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 38.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1349 | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1312 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 15.7 (#149)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 10% |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads
Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 26.3 (#134)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1316 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |
Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 leads
Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283), Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 37.5 (#152)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 0% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1360 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 43.1 (#187)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1284 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 69.0 (#178)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1308 |
Long Context Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 39.5 (#177)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1299 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1: 52.2 (#175)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1320 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1314 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1317 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Laguna M.1 or Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 better for coding?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253b v1 has 11.