Model comparison
Laguna M.1 vs Mistral Medium
Mistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.3 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Poolside
Mistral AISummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Laguna M.1 scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Medium in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Mistral Medium leads 28.1 to 21.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Surface Evolver Bench: 15.6% for Laguna M.1 and 26.9% for Mistral Medium.
Side by side
| Laguna M.1 | Mistral Medium | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 36.3 |
| Released | 2026-04-28 | 2023-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 33K | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Laguna M.1 leads
Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204), Mistral Medium: 34.2 (#243)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | — | 8% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1349 | — |
| SciCode | — | 40.2% |
| WeirdML | — | 43.7% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1434 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 763.98 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Mistral Medium: 28.3 (#90)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 37.7% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184), Mistral Medium: 24.0 (#167)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | 26.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 50% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1426 |
| DTBench | — | 75.5% |
| LMCA | — | 26.1% |
Math Mistral Medium leads
Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283), Mistral Medium: 28.1 (#245)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 0% | 9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 32.2% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1408 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 81.6% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Mistral Medium: 25.0 (#265)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 59.5% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 4.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 22.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1408 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Mistral Medium: 35.3 (#88)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1172 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Mistral Medium: 52.1 (#91)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1408 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1447 |
| LMArena French | — | 1459 |
| LMArena German | — | 1432 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1378 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1380 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1433 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Mistral Medium: 73.7 (#116)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1398 |
Long Context Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Mistral Medium: 42.9 (#114)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1406 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Laguna M.1: —, Mistral Medium: 60.0 (#103)
| Benchmark | Laguna M.1 | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1424 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1391 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 77.3% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1418 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Laguna M.1 better than Mistral Medium?
Mistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.3 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Laguna M.1 or Mistral Medium better for coding?
Laguna M.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.6 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Laguna M.1 and Mistral Medium share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Laguna M.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium has 36.