Model comparison

Llama 13b vs Llama 3-8B

Llama 3-8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 25.5 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Llama 13b Meta

24.4

Rank #348 Confirmed

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 1 category and Llama 3-8B in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3-8B leads 37.5 to 13.8.

Side by side

Llama 13b and Llama 3-8B specifications
Llama 13bLlama 3-8B
ProviderMetaMeta
Noometry Index24.425.5
Released2023-02-242024-04-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2134

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3-8B leads

Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337), Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Coding6831152
BigCodeBench Instruct—31.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—36.9%
HumanEval+—56.7%
MBPP+—54.8%

Reasoning Too close to call

Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329), Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Hard Prompts7281133
Epoch Capabilities Index100.58116.45
WinoGrande73%75.7%
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench—43.9%
Adversarial NLI—57.3%
BIG-Bench Hard37.9%—
ForecastBench—58.6
HellaSwag79.2%—
LAMBADA75.2%—
PIQA80.1%—

Math Llama 13b leads

Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256), Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Math8381151
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—1.9%
MATH Level 5—6.1%
GSM8K20.6%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bLlama 3-8B
ARC (AI2) Challenge52.7%82.8%
MMLU47.7%68.8%
OpenBookQA56.4%82.6%
TriviaQA77.9%67.7%
GPQA Diamond—26.1%
LMArena Expert—1113
BoolQ78.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Llama 3-8B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bLlama 3-8B
ScienceQA43.3%—

Multilingual Llama 3-8B leads

Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297), Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Non-English8191098
LMArena Chinese—1076
LMArena French—1159
LMArena German—1104
LMArena Japanese—967
LMArena Korean—1004
LMArena Russian—1109
LMArena Spanish—1173

Instruction Following Llama 3-8B leads

Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305), Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Instruction Following7811127

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Longer Query—1128

Writing & Preference Llama 3-8B leads

Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312), Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Text8341166
LMArena Creative Writing7941150
LMArena Multi-Turn7531152

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 13b better than Llama 3-8B?

Llama 3-8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 25.5 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 13b or Llama 3-8B better for coding?

Llama 3-8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.0 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Llama 3-8B share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-8B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper