Model comparison

Llama 13b vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Llama 13b Meta

24.4

Rank #348 Confirmed

Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

56.8

Rank #22 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 67.1 to 13.8.
  • Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Llama 13b and Qwen3.8 Max specifications
Llama 13bQwen3.8 Max
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index24.456.8
Released2023-02-242026-08-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked2139

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.8 Max leads

Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337), Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Coding6831502
DeepSWE—57.5%
LMArena WebDev—1674
FrontierSWE—17.8%
SciCode—53.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.8 Max
APEX-Agents—63.3%
τ²-bench Banking—55.1%
GDP.pdf—23.2%

Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads

Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329), Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts7281496
Epoch Capabilities Index100.58156.41
NYT Connections (extended)—88.3%
CritPt—20%
Chess Puzzles—40%
Mystery Game Puzzles—38%
DTBench—92%
LMCA—46.2%
BIG-Bench Hard37.9%—
HellaSwag79.2%—
LAMBADA75.2%—
PIQA80.1%—
WinoGrande73%—

Math Qwen3.8 Max leads

Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256), Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Math8381499
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—58%
GSM8K20.6%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.8 Max
GPQA Diamond—92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—47.3%
LMArena Expert—1507
ARC (AI2) Challenge52.7%—
BoolQ78.7%—
MMLU47.7%—
OpenBookQA56.4%—
TriviaQA77.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Vision—1314
Furniture Assembly—20%
ScienceQA43.3%—

Multilingual Qwen3.8 Max leads

Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297), Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Non-English8191472
LMArena Chinese—1538
LMArena French—1503
LMArena German—1483
LMArena Japanese—1467
LMArena Korean—1461
LMArena Russian—1481
LMArena Spanish—1492

Instruction Following Qwen3.8 Max leads

Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305), Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Instruction Following7811479

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Longer Query—1489

Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 Max leads

Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312), Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Text8341483
LMArena Creative Writing7941479
LMArena Multi-Turn7531489

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 13b better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 13b or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.5 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Qwen3.8 Max share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper