Model comparison
Llama 2-13B vs Palm 2
Llama 2-13B and Palm 2 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.6 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Meta
GoogleSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-13B scores higher in 6 categories and Palm 2 in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Palm 2 leads 19.1 to 12.8.
- Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama 2-13B | Palm 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 30.0 |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 32 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 2-13B leads
Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291), Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1062 | 994 |
Reasoning Palm 2 leads
Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337), Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1051 | 1005 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 42.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 58.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 106.17 | — |
| HellaSwag | 80.7% | — |
| LAMBADA | 76.5% | — |
| PIQA | 80.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 72.8% | — |
Math Too close to call
Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229), Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1065 | 1049 |
| GSM8K | 36.9% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249), Palm 2: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1030 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 60.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 82.4% | — |
| MMLU | 55.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 57% | — |
| TriviaQA | 79.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: —, Palm 2: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 55.8% | — |
Multilingual Llama 2-13B leads
Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279), Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1024 | 916 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1001 | 887 |
| LMArena French | 1044 | — |
| LMArena German | 1009 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 894 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 953 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1087 | — |
Instruction Following Llama 2-13B leads
Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287), Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1045 | 1010 |
Long Context Llama 2-13B leads
Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269), Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1064 | 1010 |
Writing & Preference Llama 2-13B leads
Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289), Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1084 | 1027 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1047 | 991 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1050 | 994 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-13B better than Palm 2?
Llama 2-13B and Palm 2 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.6 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Llama 2-13B or Palm 2 better for coding?
Llama 2-13B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.9 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-13B and Palm 2 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-13B has 32 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.