Model comparison

Llama 2-7B vs Llama 3-70B

Llama 2-7B and Llama 3-70B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.1 vs 28.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Llama 2-7B Meta

29.1

Rank #317 Confirmed

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.8

Rank #323 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 2 categories and Llama 3-70B in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Llama 2-7B leads 30.7 to 12.8.

Side by side

Llama 2-7B and Llama 3-70B specifications
Llama 2-7BLlama 3-70B
ProviderMetaMeta
Noometry Index29.128.8
Released2023-07-182024-04-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2931

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307), Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BLlama 3-70B
LMArena Coding10021206
BigCodeBench Instruct—43.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—54.5%
HumanEval+—72%
MBPP+—69%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 2-7B: —, Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BLlama 3-70B
Cybench—5%

Reasoning Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312), Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BLlama 3-70B
LMArena Hard Prompts10091195
Epoch Capabilities Index99.06122.93
WinoGrande69.2%83.5%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—35.1%
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench—54.2%
BIG-Bench Hard39.2%—
ForecastBench—57.1
HellaSwag77.2%—
LAMBADA73.3%—
PIQA78.8%—

Math Llama 2-7B leads

Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233), Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BLlama 3-70B
LMArena Math10421218
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.3%
MATH Level 5—22.6%
GSM8K16.7%—

Knowledge Llama 2-7B leads

Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248), Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BLlama 3-70B
LMArena Expert10361149
MMLU45.8%79.3%
GPQA Diamond—40.6%
ARC (AI2) Challenge45.9%—
BoolQ77.9%—
OpenBookQA58.6%—
TriviaQA73.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 2-7B: —, Llama 3-70B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BLlama 3-70B
ScienceQA43.1%—

Multilingual Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293), Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BLlama 3-70B
LMArena Non-English9731142
LMArena Chinese9731114
LMArena French9701232
LMArena German9781169
LMArena Russian9951159
LMArena Spanish10071241
LMArena Japanese—1017
LMArena Korean—1017

Instruction Following Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298), Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BLlama 3-70B
LMArena Instruction Following10061194

Long Context Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287), Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BLlama 3-70B
LMArena Longer Query9991174

Writing & Preference Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298), Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BLlama 3-70B
LMArena Text10531221
LMArena Creative Writing10331210
LMArena Multi-Turn10291223

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 2-7B better than Llama 3-70B?

Llama 2-7B and Llama 3-70B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.1 vs 28.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Llama 2-7B or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

Llama 3-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and Llama 3-70B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper