Model comparison

Llama 2-7B vs Mistral Medium

Mistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Llama 2-7B Meta

29.1

Rank #317 Confirmed

Mistral Medium Mistral AI

36.3

Rank #218 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 2 categories and Mistral Medium in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium leads 60.0 to 28.0.

Side by side

Llama 2-7B and Mistral Medium specifications
Llama 2-7BMistral Medium
ProviderMetaMistral AI
Noometry Index29.136.3
Released2023-07-182023-12-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked2936

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Medium leads

Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307), Mistral Medium: 34.2 (#243)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BMistral Medium
LMArena Coding10021434
FrontierCode—8%
SciCode—40.2%
WeirdML—43.7%
ALE-Bench—763.98

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 2-7B: —, Mistral Medium: 28.3 (#90)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BMistral Medium
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—37.7%

Reasoning Mistral Medium leads

Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312), Mistral Medium: 24.0 (#167)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BMistral Medium
LMArena Hard Prompts10091426
Kagi LLM Benchmark—50%
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench—75.5%
LMCA—26.1%
Surface Evolver Bench—26.9%
BIG-Bench Hard39.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index99.06—
HellaSwag77.2%—
LAMBADA73.3%—
PIQA78.8%—
WinoGrande69.2%—

Math Llama 2-7B leads

Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233), Mistral Medium: 28.1 (#245)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BMistral Medium
LMArena Math10421408
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—32.2%
ProofBench—9%
MATH Level 5—81.6%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0.3%
GSM8K16.7%—

Knowledge Llama 2-7B leads

Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248), Mistral Medium: 25.0 (#265)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BMistral Medium
LMArena Expert10361408
GPQA Diamond—59.5%
Humanity's Last Exam—4.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—22.7%
ARC (AI2) Challenge45.9%—
BoolQ77.9%—
MMLU45.8%—
OpenBookQA58.6%—
TriviaQA73.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 2-7B: —, Mistral Medium: 35.3 (#88)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BMistral Medium
LMArena Vision—1172
ScienceQA43.1%—

Multilingual Mistral Medium leads

Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293), Mistral Medium: 52.1 (#91)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BMistral Medium
LMArena Non-English9731408
LMArena Chinese9731447
LMArena French9701459
LMArena German9781432
LMArena Russian9951411
LMArena Spanish10071433
LMArena Japanese—1378
LMArena Korean—1380

Instruction Following Mistral Medium leads

Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298), Mistral Medium: 73.7 (#116)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BMistral Medium
LMArena Instruction Following10061398

Long Context Mistral Medium leads

Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287), Mistral Medium: 42.9 (#114)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BMistral Medium
LMArena Longer Query9991406

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium leads

Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298), Mistral Medium: 60.0 (#103)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-7BMistral Medium
LMArena Text10531424
LMArena Creative Writing10331391
LMArena Multi-Turn10291418
Short-Story Creative Writing—77.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 2-7B better than Mistral Medium?

Mistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 2-7B or Mistral Medium better for coding?

Mistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.2 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and Mistral Medium share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper