Model comparison

Llama 3.1-405B vs Yi-34B

Llama 3.1-405B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.7 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.1-405B Meta

30.7

Rank #288 Confirmed

Yi-34B 01.AI

27.8

Rank #329 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-405B scores higher in 6 categories and Yi-34B in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama 3.1-405B leads 30.4 to 7.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 49.8% for Llama 3.1-405B and 5.1% for Yi-34B.

Side by side

Llama 3.1-405B and Yi-34B specifications
Llama 3.1-405BYi-34B
ProviderMeta01.AI
Noometry Index30.727.8
Released2024-07-232023-11-02
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4223

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Llama 3.1-405B: 33.1 (#262), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BYi-34B
LMArena Coding12911112
WeirdML21.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 21.0 (#140), Yi-34B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BYi-34B
TheAgentCompany7.4%—
Cybench7.5%—

Reasoning Yi-34B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 16.8 (#300), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BYi-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts12691104
BIG-Bench Hard82.9%71.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index128.75117.39
SimpleBench23%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark45%—
DTBench61.4%—
ForecastBench59.9—
HellaSwag89.2%—
PIQA85.9%—
WinoGrande89.2%—

Math Yi-34B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 18.4 (#290), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BYi-34B
LMArena Math12811114
MATH Level 549.8%5.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20259.7%—
Omni-MATH24.9%—
GSM8K—76%

Knowledge Llama 3.1-405B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#227), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BYi-34B
GPQA Diamond50.9%14.7%
LMArena Expert12431061
MMLU84.5%76.3%
MMLU-Pro72.3%—
Confabulations17.6%—
GPQA (HELM)52.2%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge95.3%—
TriviaQA82.7%—

Multilingual Llama 3.1-405B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 40.7 (#214), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BYi-34B
LMArena Non-English12481079
LMArena Chinese12421176
LMArena French12791081
LMArena German12521042
LMArena Japanese1208993
LMArena Korean1184959
LMArena Russian12651050
LMArena Spanish12601070

Instruction Following Llama 3.1-405B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 65.9 (#214), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BYi-34B
LMArena Instruction Following12591091
IFEval81.1%—

Long Context Llama 3.1-405B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#197), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BYi-34B
LMArena Longer Query12661094

Writing & Preference Llama 3.1-405B leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.9 (#251), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BYi-34B
LMArena Text12841129
LMArena Creative Writing12621108
LMArena Multi-Turn12971113
EQ-Bench Creative Writing870—
WildBench78.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1-405B better than Yi-34B?

Llama 3.1-405B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.7 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1-405B or Yi-34B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (33.1 vs 32.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-405B and Yi-34B share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-405B has 42 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper