Model comparison

Llama 3.1-70B vs Llama 3-8B

Llama 3.1-70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.6 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 25 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.1-70B Meta

29.6

Rank #308 Confirmed

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-70B scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 3-8B in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama 3.1-70B leads 24.2 to 7.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 36.7% for Llama 3.1-70B and 6.1% for Llama 3-8B.

Side by side

Llama 3.1-70B and Llama 3-8B specifications
Llama 3.1-70BLlama 3-8B
ProviderMetaMeta
Noometry Index29.625.5
Released2024-07-232024-04-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.40—
Output $ / M tokens$0.40—
Results tracked3534

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Llama 3.1-70B: 30.3 (#296), Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-70BLlama 3-8B
BigCodeBench Instruct46.1%31.9%
LMArena Coding12601152
BigCodeBench Complete54.8%36.9%
WeirdML9%—
HumanEval+—56.7%
MBPP+—54.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.1-70B: 25.1 (#112), Llama 3-8B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-70BLlama 3-8B
TheAgentCompany6.9%—
BALROG27.9%—

Reasoning Llama 3.1-70B leads

Llama 3.1-70B: 21.6 (#220), Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-70BLlama 3-8B
LMArena Hard Prompts12411133
DTBench60%43.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index125.92116.45
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMCA14.8%—
Adversarial NLI—57.3%
ForecastBench—58.6
WinoGrande—75.7%

Math Llama 3.1-70B leads

Llama 3.1-70B: 13.5 (#304), Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-70BLlama 3-8B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20253.6%1.9%
LMArena Math12521151
MATH Level 536.7%6.1%
Omni-MATH21%—

Knowledge Llama 3.1-70B leads

Llama 3.1-70B: 24.2 (#269), Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-70BLlama 3-8B
GPQA Diamond44.2%26.1%
LMArena Expert12091113
MMLU80.1%68.8%
MMLU-Pro65.3%—
GPQA (HELM)42.6%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—82.8%
OpenBookQA—82.6%
TriviaQA—67.7%

Multilingual Llama 3.1-70B leads

Llama 3.1-70B: 38.8 (#225), Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-70BLlama 3-8B
LMArena Non-English12191098
LMArena Chinese12151076
LMArena French12611159
LMArena German12221104
LMArena Japanese1132967
LMArena Korean11401004
LMArena Russian12341109
LMArena Spanish12531173

Instruction Following Llama 3.1-70B leads

Llama 3.1-70B: 65.3 (#223), Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-70BLlama 3-8B
LMArena Instruction Following12311127
IFEval82.1%—

Long Context Llama 3.1-70B leads

Llama 3.1-70B: 37.6 (#214), Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-70BLlama 3-8B
LMArena Longer Query12411128

Writing & Preference Llama 3-8B leads

Llama 3.1-70B: 35.4 (#267), Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-70BLlama 3-8B
LMArena Text12611166
LMArena Creative Writing12321150
LMArena Multi-Turn12561152
EQ-Bench Creative Writing784—
WildBench75.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1-70B better than Llama 3-8B?

Llama 3.1-70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.6 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1-70B or Llama 3-8B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (30.3 vs 31.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-70B and Llama 3-8B share?

25 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-70B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-8B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper