Model comparison
Llama 3.1-8B vs Mistral Nemo
Mistral Nemo is the stronger model overall, scoring 25.9 to 22.8 on the Noometry Index. Llama 3.1-8B costs 2.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Nemo's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Mistral AISummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-8B scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Nemo in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Mistral Nemo leads 23.5 to 9.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 22.9% for Llama 3.1-8B and 10.8% for Mistral Nemo.
- Llama 3.1-8B is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.15 for Mistral Nemo.
Side by side
| Llama 3.1-8B | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 22.8 | 25.9 |
| Released | 2024-07-23 | 2024-07-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 128K |
| Max output | 4K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.05 | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.08 | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 43 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3.1-8B: 19.9 (#335), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 13.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 1.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 32.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1195 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.5% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 62.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.6% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Mistral Nemo leads
Llama 3.1-8B: 22.3 (#123), Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25.8% | 27.6% |
| BALROG | 15.1% | 17.6% |
Reasoning Mistral Nemo leads
Llama 3.1-8B: 14.5 (#316), Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 50.9% | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.48 | 118.63 |
| PIQA | 81.2% | 83.5% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1175 | — |
| LMCA | 5.4% | — |
Math Mistral Nemo leads
Llama 3.1-8B: 9.5 (#311), Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 22.9% | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | 82.4% | 84.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 13.7% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1179 | — |
Knowledge Mistral Nemo leads
Llama 3.1-8B: 8.0 (#302), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27% | 29.9% |
| BoolQ | 82.8% | 82.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | 40.6% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 24.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1144 | — |
| MMLU | 56.1% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.1-8B: 34.2 (#244), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1148 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1151 | — |
| LMArena French | 1176 | — |
| LMArena German | 1144 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1061 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1053 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1158 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1169 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.1-8B: 59.1 (#253), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 74.3% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1159 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.1-8B: 35.8 (#233), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1182 | — |
Writing & Preference Llama 3.1-8B leads
Llama 3.1-8B: 29.9 (#285), Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 713 | 881 |
| LMArena Text | 1187 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1154 | — |
| WildBench | 68.7% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1172 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.1-8B better than Mistral Nemo?
Mistral Nemo is the stronger model overall, scoring 25.9 to 22.8 on the Noometry Index. Llama 3.1-8B costs 2.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Nemo's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1-8B or Mistral Nemo?
Llama 3.1-8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Mistral Nemo lists at $0.15 and $0.15.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 128K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-8B and Mistral Nemo share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-8B has 43 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.