Model comparison
Llama 3.2 1B vs Mistral 7B
Mistral 7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 23.0 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index. Llama 3.2 1B costs 3.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral 7B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Mistral AISummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 1B scores higher in 2 categories and Mistral 7B in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral 7B leads 30.7 to 21.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 11.3% for Llama 3.2 1B and 27.3% for Mistral 7B.
- Llama 3.2 1B is cheaper at $0.027 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $0.25 for Mistral 7B.
- Llama 3.2 1B accepts more context: 60K tokens versus 8K.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 1B | Mistral 7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 20.1 | 23.0 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | 2023-09-27 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 60K | 8K |
| Max output | 54K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.027 | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.20 | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 22 | 37 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mistral 7B leads
Llama 3.2 1B: 21.1 (#338), Mistral 7B: 26.4 (#326)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 8.2% | 19.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1070 | 1082 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 11.3% | 27.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 36% |
| MBPP+ | — | 42.1% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.2 1B: 14.6 (#150), Mistral 7B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 10.8% | — |
| BALROG | 6.6% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.2 1B leads
Llama 3.2 1B: 16.2 (#308), Mistral 7B: 13.1 (#336)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1044 | 1067 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 101.99 | 112.21 |
| DTBench | — | 42.5% |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 47.1% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 56.1% |
| HellaSwag | — | 81% |
| PIQA | — | 83% |
| WinoGrande | — | 75.3% |
Math Llama 3.2 1B leads
Llama 3.2 1B: 10.4 (#313), Mistral 7B: 8.1 (#325)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | 0.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1086 | 1085 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 3.7% |
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |
Knowledge Too close to call
Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#312), Mistral 7B: 7.4 (#311)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.9% | 15.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1007 | 1036 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.6% |
| BoolQ | — | 87.4% |
| MMLU | — | 62.5% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 79.8% |
| TriviaQA | — | 75.2% |
Multilingual Mistral 7B leads
Llama 3.2 1B: 23.8 (#292), Mistral 7B: 25.8 (#283)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1012 |
| LMArena Chinese | 959 | 1009 |
| LMArena German | 1014 | 987 |
| LMArena Russian | 941 | 1018 |
| LMArena French | — | 1037 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 878 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1026 |
Instruction Following Mistral 7B leads
Llama 3.2 1B: 52.4 (#290), Mistral 7B: 54.2 (#280)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | 1060 |
Long Context Too close to call
Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#274), Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#271)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1050 | 1060 |
Writing & Preference Mistral 7B leads
Llama 3.2 1B: 21.3 (#310), Mistral 7B: 30.7 (#286)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Mistral 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1055 | 1090 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1068 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1030 | 1062 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 200 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 1B better than Mistral 7B?
Mistral 7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 23.0 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index. Llama 3.2 1B costs 3.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral 7B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Llama 3.2 1B or Mistral 7B?
Llama 3.2 1B is cheaper. It lists at $0.027 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Mistral 7B lists at $0.25 and $0.25.
Is Llama 3.2 1B or Mistral 7B better for coding?
Mistral 7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 26.4 versus 21.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Llama 3.2 1B does, with 60K tokens against 8K.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 1B and Mistral 7B share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 1B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Mistral 7B has 37.