Model comparison
Llama 3.2 90B vs Palm 2
Palm 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.0 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Palm 2 leads 30.8 to 11.1.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama 3.2 90B | Palm 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 27.5 | 30.0 |
| Released | 2024-09-24 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 994 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80), Palm 2: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 27.3% | — |
Reasoning Llama 3.2 90B leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217), Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 0.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1005 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.5 | — |
Math Palm 2 leads
Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308), Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1049 |
| MATH Level 5 | 39.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274), Palm 2: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41% | — |
| MMLU | 80.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124), Palm 2: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1000 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 916 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 887 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1010 |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1010 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.2 90B: —, Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 90B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1027 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 991 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 994 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.2 90B better than Palm 2?
Palm 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.0 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 90B and Palm 2 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 90B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.