Model comparison
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 vs Qwen3.6 Flash
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.1 | 38.8 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-27 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.19 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.13 |
| Results tracked | 10 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 37.9 (#186), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1296 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 26.2 (#135), Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1311 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.26 |
Math Not comparable
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: —, Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: —, Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 41.1 (#211), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1253 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1277 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1269 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 68.3 (#189), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1293 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 39.5 (#176), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1299 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 50.8 (#179), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1308 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1315 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 better than Qwen3.6 Flash?
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 and Qwen3.6 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.