Model comparison

Llama 3-70B vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.5

Rank #317 Confirmed

Qwen3 Coder Next Alibaba (Qwen)

33.8

Rank #229 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 21.7 to 17.4.

Side by side

Llama 3-70B and Qwen3 Coder Next specifications
Llama 3-70BQwen3 Coder Next
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index28.533.8
Released2024-04-182026-02-02
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.12
Output $ / M tokens—$0.80
Results tracked313

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Llama 3-70B: 35.3 (#215), Qwen3 Coder Next: 35.8 (#206)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3 Coder Next
SciCode—32.3%
WeirdML—34.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct43.6%—
LMArena Coding1206—
BigCodeBench Complete54.5%—
HumanEval+72%—
MBPP+69%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 20.9 (#132), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3 Coder Next
Cybench5%—

Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads

Llama 3-70B: 17.4 (#284), Qwen3 Coder Next: 21.7 (#191)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3 Coder Next
Kagi LLM Benchmark35.1%—
CritPt—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1195—
DTBench54.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index122.91—
ForecastBench57.1—
WinoGrande83.5%—

Math Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 12.0 (#299), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3 Coder Next
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%—
LMArena Math1218—
MATH Level 522.6%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#272), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3 Coder Next
GPQA Diamond40.6%—
LMArena Expert1149—
MMLU79.3%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 33.8 (#246), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Non-English1142—
LMArena Chinese1114—
LMArena French1231—
LMArena German1169—
LMArena Japanese1017—
LMArena Korean1017—
LMArena Russian1159—
LMArena Spanish1241—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 62.8 (#233), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Instruction Following1194—

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#235), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Longer Query1174—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 43.0 (#225), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Text1221—
LMArena Creative Writing1210—
LMArena Multi-Turn1223—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-70B better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3-70B or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (35.3 vs 35.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper