Model comparison

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs Phi-4

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Phi-4 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.8 vs 31.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat NVIDIA

31.8

Rank #268 Confirmed

Phi-4 Microsoft

31.2

Rank #279 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 2 categories and Phi-4 in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads 31.3 to 20.8.

Side by side

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Phi-4 specifications
Llama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi-4
ProviderNVIDIAMicrosoft
Noometry Index31.831.2
Released—2024-12-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.07
Output $ / M tokens—$0.14
Results tracked937

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Phi-4 leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300), Phi-4: 34.4 (#239)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi-4
LMArena Coding10251231
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.5%
LiveBench Coding—30.7%
BigCodeBench Complete—55.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Phi-4: 22.8 (#128)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi-4
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.8%
BALROG—11.6%

Reasoning Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246), Phi-4: 17.7 (#291)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi-4
LMArena Hard Prompts10471220
Chess Puzzles—1%
LiveBench Reasoning—47.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—45.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—130.42
LiveBench—41.6%

Math Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226), Phi-4: 20.8 (#285)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi-4
LMArena Math10721246
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—13.8%
LiveBench Math—42%
MATH Level 5—64.9%

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, Phi-4: 32.6 (#209)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi-4
GPQA Diamond—56.1%
Confabulations—29.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—3.7%
LMArena Expert—1203
MMLU—84.8%

Multilingual Phi-4 leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270), Phi-4: 37.2 (#237)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi-4
LMArena Non-English10631197
LMArena Chinese—1212
LMArena French—1224
LMArena German—1222
LMArena Japanese—1158
LMArena Korean—1151
LMArena Russian—1209
LMArena Spanish—1234

Instruction Following Phi-4 leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279), Phi-4: 60.4 (#251)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi-4
LMArena Instruction Following10601201
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.4%

Long Context Phi-4 leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288), Phi-4: 36.9 (#226)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi-4
LMArena Longer Query9981217

Writing & Preference Phi-4 leads

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283), Phi-4: 40.5 (#244)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama2 70b Steerlm ChatPhi-4
LMArena Text10981217
LMArena Creative Writing10911182
LMArena Multi-Turn10581206
Short-Story Creative Writing—62.6%
LiveBench Language—25.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than Phi-4?

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Phi-4 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.8 vs 31.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or Phi-4 better for coding?

Phi-4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.4 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and Phi-4 share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper