Model comparison

Longcat Flash Chat vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 26.8 to 19.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 17.7% for Longcat Flash Chat and 34.4% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

Side by side

Longcat Flash Chat and MiMo-V2.5-Pro specifications
Longcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProviderMeituanXiaomi
Noometry Index42.145.2
Released—2026-04-22
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked1927

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Coding14711503
LMArena WebDev—1479
SciCode—50.2%
ALE-Bench—899.8

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.5-Pro
NYT Connections (extended)17.7%34.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts14401488
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.9%—
CritPt—4%
DTBench—84.5%
LMCA—29.5%

Math Too close to call

Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Math14421481
ProofBench—22%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Expert14541503

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Non-English14041449
LMArena Chinese14651507
LMArena French14561488
LMArena German14081458
LMArena Japanese13731412
LMArena Korean13711437
LMArena Russian13951450
LMArena Spanish14451471

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following14111477

Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Longer Query14251483

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text14271465
LMArena Creative Writing13881440
LMArena Multi-Turn14181477
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1493
EQ-Bench 4—1208

Frequently asked questions

Is Longcat Flash Chat better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Longcat Flash Chat or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 43.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper