Model comparison

Longcat Flash Chat vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

41.5

Rank #121 Confirmed

Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral AI

39.6

Rank #151 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 6 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 42.9 to 35.7.

Side by side

Longcat Flash Chat and Mistral Medium 3.5 specifications
Longcat Flash ChatMistral Medium 3.5
ProviderMeituanMistral AI
Noometry Index41.539.6
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—210K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1922

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 42.9 (#85), Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.7 (#208)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Coding14711461
LMArena WebDev—1263

Reasoning Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 18.3 (#267), Mistral Medium 3.5: 16.6 (#290)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMistral Medium 3.5
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.9%41.4%
NYT Connections (extended)17.7%12.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts14401436
Epoch Capabilities Index—141.42

Math Too close to call

Longcat Flash Chat: 36.6 (#107), Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.4 (#113)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Math14411432

Knowledge Too close to call

Longcat Flash Chat: 40.0 (#111), Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.3 (#123)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Expert14541431

Multimodal Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 37.6 (#64)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision—1222

Multilingual Too close to call

Longcat Flash Chat: 52.1 (#95), Mistral Medium 3.5: 52.1 (#93)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Non-English14041405
LMArena Chinese14651443
LMArena French14571448
LMArena German14091453
LMArena Korean13721387
LMArena Russian13961396
LMArena Spanish14451406
LMArena Japanese1373—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Longcat Flash Chat: 74.6 (#92), Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.7 (#87)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Instruction Following14111414

Long Context Too close to call

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#89), Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#101)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Longer Query14251414

Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 61.2 (#88), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.6 (#113)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text14271421
LMArena Creative Writing13881372
LMArena Multi-Turn14181423
EQ-Bench 4—993

Frequently asked questions

Is Longcat Flash Chat better than Mistral Medium 3.5?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Longcat Flash Chat or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 35.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper