Model comparison

Longcat Flash Chat vs Qwen Plus

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

Qwen Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

37.1

Rank #210 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen Plus in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 39.4 to 23.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 43.9% for Longcat Flash Chat and 63.3% for Qwen Plus.
  • Longcat Flash Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Longcat Flash Chat and Qwen Plus specifications
Longcat Flash ChatQwen Plus
ProviderMeituanAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.137.1
Released—2024-01-25
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1920

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen Plus
LMArena Coding14711328

Reasoning Qwen Plus leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen Plus
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.9%63.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts14401317
NYT Connections (extended)17.7%—
DTBench—81.1%
LMCA—24%

Math Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen Plus
LMArena Math14421326
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—17.8%
MATH Level 5—65.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen Plus
LMArena Expert14541328
GPQA Diamond—48.1%

Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen Plus
LMArena Non-English14041310
LMArena Chinese14651347
LMArena Japanese13731251
LMArena Russian13951323
LMArena French1456—
LMArena German1408—
LMArena Korean1371—
LMArena Spanish1445—

Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen Plus
LMArena Instruction Following14111303

Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen Plus
LMArena Longer Query14251324

Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen Plus
LMArena Text14271326
LMArena Creative Writing13881293
LMArena Multi-Turn14181336

Frequently asked questions

Is Longcat Flash Chat better than Qwen Plus?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Longcat Flash Chat or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and Qwen Plus share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper