Model comparison
Longcat Flash Chat vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 43.5 to 36.3.
Side by side
| Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meituan | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.1 | 34.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1471 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads
Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 43.9% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 17.7% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1440 | — |
Math Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1454 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | — |
| LMArena French | 1456 | — |
| LMArena German | 1408 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1371 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1445 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1411 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1425 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Longcat Flash Chat | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1418 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Longcat Flash Chat better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Longcat Flash Chat or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.