Model comparison

Longcat Flash Chat vs Step 3.5 Flash

Longcat Flash Chat and Step 3.5 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.1 vs 42.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

Step 3.5 Flash StepFun

42.3

Rank #116 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 6 categories and Step 3.5 Flash in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.5 Flash leads 42.6 to 39.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 17.7% for Longcat Flash Chat and 28.4% for Step 3.5 Flash.

Side by side

Longcat Flash Chat and Step 3.5 Flash specifications
Longcat Flash ChatStep 3.5 Flash
ProviderMeituanStepFun
Noometry Index42.142.3
Released—2026-01-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—256K
Max output—256K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked1919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.4 (#105)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Coding14711436

Reasoning Step 3.5 Flash leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), Step 3.5 Flash: 22.2 (#202)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatStep 3.5 Flash
NYT Connections (extended)17.7%28.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts14401411
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.9%—

Math Step 3.5 Flash leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.6 (#84)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Math14421408
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—66.8%

Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.6 (#132)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Expert14541421

Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.5 (#119)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English14041385
LMArena Chinese14651447
LMArena French14561421
LMArena German14081405
LMArena Japanese13731354
LMArena Korean13711352
LMArena Russian13951385
LMArena Spanish14451419

Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.1 (#124)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14111385

Long Context Too close to call

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#117)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Longer Query14251402

Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), Step 3.5 Flash: 58.8 (#113)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text14271403
LMArena Creative Writing13881357
LMArena Multi-Turn14181405

Frequently asked questions

Is Longcat Flash Chat better than Step 3.5 Flash?

Longcat Flash Chat and Step 3.5 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.1 vs 42.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Longcat Flash Chat or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and Step 3.5 Flash share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper