Model comparison

Magistral Small vs o1-mini

o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.0 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Small Mistral AI

30.2

Rank #296 Confirmed

o1-mini OpenAI

34.0

Rank #235 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Small scores higher in 1 category and o1-mini in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where o1-mini leads 35.4 to 26.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 30% for Magistral Small and 46.9% for o1-mini.
  • Magistral Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Magistral Small and o1-mini specifications
Magistral Smallo1-mini
ProviderMistral AIOpenAI
Noometry Index30.234.0
Released2025-06-102024-09-12
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K—
Max output40K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.50—
Output $ / M tokens$1.50—
Results tracked1039

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Magistral Small leads

Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176), o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral Smallo1-mini
Aider Polyglot—32.9%
SciCode35.2%—
WeirdML—36.3%
LiveBench Coding—48%
LMArena Coding—1362
HumanEval+—89%
MBPP+—78.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral Smallo1-mini
Cybench—10%

Reasoning o1-mini leads

Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350), o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral Smallo1-mini
ARC-AGI-20%0.8%
ARC-AGI-15%14%
Epoch Capabilities Index133.19135.82
SimpleBench—18.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark6.3%—
CritPt0.3%—
Chess Puzzles3%—
LiveBench Reasoning—72.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1333
DTBench61.3%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—57.9%
LiveBench—57.8%

Math o1-mini leads

Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261), o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral Smallo1-mini
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202530%46.9%
LiveBench Math—62%
LMArena Math—1358
MATH Level 5—89.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge o1-mini leads

Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223), o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral Smallo1-mini
GPQA Diamond56.1%62.4%
Confabulations—18.6%
LMArena Expert—1316

Multilingual Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral Smallo1-mini
LMArena Non-English—1289
LMArena Chinese—1314
LMArena French—1293
LMArena German—1278
LMArena Japanese—1245
LMArena Korean—1223
LMArena Russian—1283
LMArena Spanish—1303

Instruction Following Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral Smallo1-mini
LiveBench Instruction Following—65.4%
LMArena Instruction Following—1304

Long Context Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral Smallo1-mini
LMArena Longer Query—1320

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral Smallo1-mini
LMArena Text—1317
LMArena Creative Writing—1244
Short-Story Creative Writing—64.9%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1314
LiveBench Language—40.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Small better than o1-mini?

o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.0 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Magistral Small or o1-mini better for coding?

Magistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and o1-mini share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper