Model comparison

Mercury 2.5 vs Phi-3.5-MoE

Neither Mercury 2.5 nor Phi-3.5-MoE has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Mercury 2.5 Inception

30.2

Unranked Sparse

Phi-3.5-MoE Microsoft

—

Unranked

Summary

  • Phi-3.5-MoE has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mercury 2.5 and Phi-3.5-MoE specifications
Mercury 2.5Phi-3.5-MoE
ProviderInceptionMicrosoft
Noometry Index30.2—
Released2026-09-082024-08-17
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window260K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.04—
Output $ / M tokens$0.15—
Results tracked23

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mercury 2.5: —, Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Phi-3.5-MoE
ALE-Bench301.65—

Reasoning Not comparable

Mercury 2.5: —, Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Phi-3.5-MoE
PIQA—88.6%

Math Not comparable

Mercury 2.5: 22.4, Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Phi-3.5-MoE
ProofBench3%—
GSM8K—88.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Mercury 2.5: —, Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMercury 2.5Phi-3.5-MoE
BoolQ—84.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Mercury 2.5 better than Phi-3.5-MoE?

Neither Mercury 2.5 nor Phi-3.5-MoE has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.

How many benchmarks do Mercury 2.5 and Phi-3.5-MoE share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury 2.5 has 2 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-MoE has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper