Model comparison
Mercury vs MiniMax-M2.5
Mercury and MiniMax-M2.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 38.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M2.5 in 5 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiniMax-M2.5 leads 47.9 to 38.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 21.6% for Mercury and 55.2% for MiniMax-M2.5.
- MiniMax-M2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mercury | MiniMax-M2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 38.1 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2.5 leads
Mercury: 38.1 (#164), MiniMax-M2.5: 47.9 (#53)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1323 | 1380 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 75.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1386 |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | 68.3% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 618.17 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mercury: —, MiniMax-M2.5: 30.2 (#70)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 42.7% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | -23.16 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Mercury: 16.8 (#288), MiniMax-M2.5: 17.6 (#281)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 21.6% | 55.2% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1372 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 63.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.68 |
Math Not comparable
Mercury: —, MiniMax-M2.5: 25.8 (#242)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 4% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1378 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mercury: —, MiniMax-M2.5: 38.6 (#132)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1378 |
Multilingual MiniMax-M2.5 leads
Mercury: 41.7 (#201), MiniMax-M2.5: 47.3 (#147)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1259 | 1338 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1392 |
| LMArena French | — | 1363 |
| LMArena German | — | 1361 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1169 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1232 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1359 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1354 |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.5 leads
Mercury: 65.3 (#220), MiniMax-M2.5: 71.7 (#143)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1238 | 1353 |
Long Context Too close to call
Mercury: 38.3 (#193), MiniMax-M2.5: 37.4 (#211)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1264 | 1367 |
| CL-bench | — | 11.4% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.3% |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.5 leads
Mercury: 46.2 (#216), MiniMax-M2.5: 54.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | Mercury | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | 1359 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1186 | 1331 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1283 | 1364 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1361 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mercury better than MiniMax-M2.5?
Mercury and MiniMax-M2.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 38.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Mercury or MiniMax-M2.5 better for coding?
MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Mercury and MiniMax-M2.5 share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.5 has 33.