Model comparison

Mercury vs o3-mini

Mercury and o3-mini score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.6 vs 36.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Mercury Inception

37.6

Rank #199 Confirmed

o3-mini OpenAI

36.7

Rank #212 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury scores higher in 2 categories and o3-mini in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where o3-mini leads 75.1 to 65.2.

Side by side

Mercury and o3-mini specifications
Mercuryo3-mini
ProviderInceptionOpenAI
Noometry Index37.636.7
Released—2024-12-20
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.10
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked951

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3-mini leads

Mercury: 38.7 (#170), o3-mini: 40.8 (#132)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryo3-mini
LMArena Coding13221378
Aider Polyglot—60.4%
SciCode—39.8%
GSO—1.3%
WeirdML—43.7%
LiveBench Coding—82.7%
CadEval—54%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mercury: —, o3-mini: 29.6 (#84)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryo3-mini
Cybench—22.5%

Reasoning Mercury leads

Mercury: 17.5 (#293), o3-mini: 16.3 (#305)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryo3-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts12851366
ARC-AGI-2—3%
SimpleBench—22.8%
Kagi LLM Benchmark21.6%—
ARC-AGI-1—34.5%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—17%
LiveBench Reasoning—89.6%
Mystery Game Puzzles—7%
DTBench—68.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—70.6%
LMCA—19%
Epoch Capabilities Index—140.34
ForecastBench—59.6
LiveBench—75.9%

Math Not comparable

Mercury: —, o3-mini: 28.1 (#244)

Knowledge Not comparable

Mercury: —, o3-mini: 38.3 (#146)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryo3-mini
GPQA Diamond—77%
SimpleQA Verified—15.3%
Confabulations—17.9%
LMArena Expert—1364

Multilingual o3-mini leads

Mercury: 41.6 (#206), o3-mini: 45.7 (#164)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryo3-mini
LMArena Non-English12601319
LMArena Chinese—1379
LMArena French—1334
LMArena German—1303
LMArena Japanese—1286
LMArena Korean—1314
LMArena Russian—1304
LMArena Spanish—1321

Instruction Following o3-mini leads

Mercury: 65.2 (#224), o3-mini: 75.1 (#72)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryo3-mini
LMArena Instruction Following12391337
LiveBench Instruction Following—84.4%

Long Context Mercury leads

Mercury: 38.4 (#198), o3-mini: 33.8 (#256)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryo3-mini
LMArena Longer Query12661343
Fiction.LiveBench—50%

Writing & Preference o3-mini leads

Mercury: 46.2 (#221), o3-mini: 50.3 (#182)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryo3-mini
LMArena Text12821337
LMArena Creative Writing11911286
LMArena Multi-Turn12821320
Short-Story Creative Writing—61.7%
LiveBench Language—50.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Mercury better than o3-mini?

Mercury and o3-mini score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.6 vs 36.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Mercury or o3-mini better for coding?

o3-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mercury and o3-mini share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury has 9 scored results on Noometry and o3-mini has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper