Model comparison

Mercury vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Mercury and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 37.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Mercury Inception

37.3

Rank #192 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Mercury scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 55.5 to 46.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 21.6% for Mercury and 49.5% for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mercury and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
MercuryQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderInceptionAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.337.7
Released—2025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked925

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mercury leads

Mercury: 38.1 (#164), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.2 (#199)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Coding13231413
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
LMArena WebDev—1275
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mercury: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.7 (#116)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%

Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Mercury: 16.8 (#288), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 24.7 (#141)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark21.6%49.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts12841372

Math Not comparable

Mercury: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 34.9 (#151)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math—1364

Knowledge Not comparable

Mercury: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.4 (#159)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert—1337

Multilingual Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Mercury: 41.7 (#201), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.8 (#143)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English12591345
LMArena Chinese—1356
LMArena French—1394
LMArena German—1324
LMArena Japanese—1309
LMArena Korean—1307
LMArena Russian—1367
LMArena Spanish—1360

Instruction Following Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Mercury: 65.3 (#220), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.8 (#142)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12381356

Long Context Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Mercury: 38.3 (#193), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#126)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12641379

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Mercury: 46.2 (#216), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.5 (#142)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMercuryQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text12821356
LMArena Creative Writing11861333
LMArena Multi-Turn12831365

Frequently asked questions

Is Mercury better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Mercury and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 37.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Mercury or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Mercury scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 36.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mercury and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mercury has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper