Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs MiniMax-M2
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and MiniMax-M2 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.3 to 53.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 34.4% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro and 14.8% for MiniMax-M2.
- Both cost about the same: $0.43 input and $0.87 output per million tokens.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 205K.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax-M2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 45.2 | 37.4 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | 2025-10-27 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 205K |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 27 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60), MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1479 | 1297 |
| LMArena Coding | 1503 | 1370 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 61% |
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 899.8 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —, MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 30% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 160.6 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130), MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 34.4% | 14.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1488 | 1357 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 57.8% |
| CritPt | 4% | — |
| DTBench | 84.5% | — |
| LMCA | 29.5% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96), MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1352 |
| ProofBench | 22% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98), MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1503 | 1337 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34), MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1449 | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1366 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | 1335 |
| LMArena German | 1458 | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1471 | 1326 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1437 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21), MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1477 | 1328 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37), MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1483 | 1331 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49), MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1465 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1286 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | 1361 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1493 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1208 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than MiniMax-M2?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or MiniMax-M2?
MiniMax-M2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.
Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 39.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and MiniMax-M2 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.