Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Muse Glimmer
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Muse Glimmer in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 47.0 to 38.7.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 44.8 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.0 (#58), Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1477 | 1355 |
| LMArena Coding | 1502 | 1417 |
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 899.8 | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 25.9 (#124), Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1487 | 1395 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 34.4% | — |
| CritPt | 4% | — |
| DTBench | 84.5% | — |
| LMCA | 29.5% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 38.6 (#84), Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1480 | 1419 |
| ProofBench | 22% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 41.5 (#100), Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | 1388 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.3 (#33), Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1449 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | 1393 |
| LMArena French | 1489 | — |
| LMArena German | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1418 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1470 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.6 (#21), Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1477 | 1374 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#38), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | 1381 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.5 (#47), Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1465 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1338 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | 1398 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1493 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1208 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than Muse Glimmer?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.0 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Muse Glimmer share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 13.