Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs phi-3-medium 14B
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 42.2 to 9.1.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 45.2 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1479 | — |
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1503 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
| ALE-Bench | 899.8 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 34.4% | — |
| CritPt | 4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1488 | — |
| DTBench | 84.5% | — |
| LMCA | 29.5% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.23 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 22% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1503 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1449 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | — |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1458 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1437 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1471 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1477 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1483 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1465 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1493 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1208 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than phi-3-medium 14B?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 36.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and phi-3-medium 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.