Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5 vs MiMo-V2-Pro
MiMo-V2.5 and MiMo-V2-Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.0 vs 42.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 3 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 5 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 27.8 to 21.3.
- MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 42.4 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | 1433 |
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | 1476 |
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | 785.17 |
| SciCode | 43.1% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98), MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| CritPt | 3.7% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145), MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1436 | 1447 |
| ProofBench | 16% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109), MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1459 | 1479 |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53), MiMo-V2-Pro: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1245 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1467 | 1455 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | 1470 |
| LMArena German | 1421 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1304 | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | 1401 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1412 | 1458 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1433 | 1444 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1444 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5 better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5 and MiMo-V2-Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.0 vs 42.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.
Is MiMo-V2.5 or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (43.6 vs 43.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 1.05M tokens.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.