Noometry

Model comparison

MiMo-V2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 22 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi

43.4

Rank #93 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2.7 MiniMax

37.7

Rank #196 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 8 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 36.8 to 25.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 16% for MiMo-V2.5 and 3% for MiniMax-M2.7.
  • MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M2.7.
  • MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 205K.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.5MiniMax-M2.7
ProviderXiaomiMiniMax
Noometry Index43.437.7
Released2026-04-222026-03-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M205K
Max output131K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.14$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$0.28$1.20
Results tracked2330

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81), MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena WebDev14381398
SciCode43.1%47%
LMArena Coding14691454
ALE-Bench513.95599.25
WeirdML—37%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiMo-V2.5: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5MiniMax-M2.7
Terminal-Bench—45.1%
ExploitBench—13.3%
GBAEval—0%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101), MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5MiniMax-M2.7
CritPt3.7%0.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts14501422
NYT Connections (extended)—24.7%
Thematic Generalization—39.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—145.85

Math MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163), MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5MiniMax-M2.7
ProofBench16%3%
LMArena Math14361420

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115), MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Expert14601444
Vectara Hallucination Rate—12.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54), MiniMax-M2.7: —

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Vision1247—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99), MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Non-English14041382
LMArena Chinese14681441
LMArena French14471421
LMArena German14211398
LMArena Japanese13061262
LMArena Korean13631313
LMArena Russian13951383
LMArena Spanish14161403

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60), MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Instruction Following14341405

Long Context Too close to call

MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73), MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Longer Query14451419

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86), MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Text14281405
LMArena Creative Writing13931354
LMArena Multi-Turn14451412

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.5 better than MiniMax-M2.7?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or MiniMax-M2.7?

MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2.7 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

Is MiMo-V2.5 or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.

Related comparisons

Go deeper