Model comparison

MiMo-V2.5 vs Step 3.5 Flash

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi

43.0

Rank #89 Confirmed

Step 3.5 Flash StepFun

41.7

Rank #116 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 7 categories and Step 3.5 Flash in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 27.8 to 21.2.
  • Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2.5.
  • MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.5 and Step 3.5 Flash specifications
MiMo-V2.5Step 3.5 Flash
ProviderXiaomiStepFun
Noometry Index43.041.7
Released2026-04-222026-01-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M256K
Max output131K256K
Input $ / M tokens$0.14$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$0.28$0.30
Results tracked2319

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75), Step 3.5 Flash: 41.7 (#106)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Coding14691436
LMArena WebDev1438—
SciCode43.1%—
ALE-Bench513.95—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98), Step 3.5 Flash: 21.2 (#202)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts14501411
NYT Connections (extended)—28.4%
CritPt3.7%—

Math Step 3.5 Flash leads

MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145), Step 3.5 Flash: 40.6 (#77)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Math14361408
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—66.8%
ProofBench16%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.0 (#127)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Expert14591422

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53), Step 3.5 Flash: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Vision1245—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.7 (#115)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English14041386
LMArena Chinese14671448
LMArena French14471421
LMArena German14211404
LMArena Japanese13041353
LMArena Korean13631350
LMArena Russian13951385
LMArena Spanish14121419

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.3 (#119)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14331385

Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#112)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Longer Query14441402

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82), Step 3.5 Flash: 59.0 (#108)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text14271403
LMArena Creative Writing13921357
LMArena Multi-Turn14451405

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.5 better than Step 3.5 Flash?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5 lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

Is MiMo-V2.5 or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 41.7 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and Step 3.5 Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper