Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs o1
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 40.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 7 categories and o1 in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.9 to 55.8.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $60 for o1.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 200K.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | o1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 44.4 | 40.6 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 200K |
| Max output | 131K | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $60 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 52 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o1 leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68), o1: 45.7 (#64)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1516 | 1367 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 61.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 47.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 69.7% |
| CadEval | — | 56% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 80.2% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —, o1: 24.3 (#111)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 51.1% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82), o1: 27.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1372 |
| SimpleBench | — | 41.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 30.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 15% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 91.6% |
| DTBench | — | 74.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| LMCA | — | 22.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.92 |
| LiveBench | — | 75.7% |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97), o1: 34.9 (#150)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1477 | 1388 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 14.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 80.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 94.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 9.3% |
Knowledge Too close to call
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91), o1: 41.5 (#101)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1516 | 1362 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 76.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 11.7% |
Multimodal MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39), o1: 33.6 (#87)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1266 | 1168 |
| GeoBench | — | 80% |
| VPCT | — | 37% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 41.4% |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41), o1: 48.8 (#137)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1439 | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1501 | 1394 |
| LMArena Russian | 1424 | 1356 |
| LMArena French | — | 1343 |
| LMArena German | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1346 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1345 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33), o1: 75.0 (#82)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | 1368 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.5% |
Long Context o1 leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52), o1: 50.3 (#9)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1465 | 1378 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61), o1: 55.8 (#139)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1459 | 1366 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1408 | 1347 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1460 | 1368 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 70.2% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 65.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than o1?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 40.6 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or o1?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; o1 lists at $15 and $60.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or o1 better for coding?
o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.7 versus 44.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and o1 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.