Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs o1-mini

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

44.4

Rank #74 Confirmed

o1-mini OpenAI

33.7

Rank #230 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 8 categories and o1-mini in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 29.6 to 8.9.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and o1-mini specifications
MiMo-V2.6-Flasho1-mini
ProviderXiaomiOpenAI
Noometry Index44.433.7
Released2026-09-222024-09-12
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.14—
Output $ / M tokens$0.28—
Results tracked1339

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68), o1-mini: 35.1 (#218)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Flasho1-mini
LMArena Coding15161362
Aider Polyglot—32.9%
WeirdML—36.3%
LiveBench Coding—48%
HumanEval+—89%
MBPP+—78.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —, o1-mini: 24.3 (#112)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Flasho1-mini
Cybench—10%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82), o1-mini: 8.9 (#340)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Flasho1-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts14811333
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—18.1%
ARC-AGI-1—14%
LiveBench Reasoning—72.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis—57.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—135.82
LiveBench—57.8%

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97), o1-mini: 33.7 (#168)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Flasho1-mini
LMArena Math14771358
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—46.9%
LiveBench Math—62%
MATH Level 5—89.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91), o1-mini: 34.8 (#180)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Flasho1-mini
LMArena Expert15161316
GPQA Diamond—62.4%
Confabulations—18.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39), o1-mini: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Flasho1-mini
LMArena Vision1266—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41), o1-mini: 43.8 (#177)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Flasho1-mini
LMArena Non-English14391289
LMArena Chinese15011314
LMArena Russian14241283
LMArena French—1292
LMArena German—1278
LMArena Japanese—1245
LMArena Korean—1223
LMArena Spanish—1302

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33), o1-mini: 67.0 (#200)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Flasho1-mini
LMArena Instruction Following14631304
LiveBench Instruction Following—65.4%

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52), o1-mini: 40.1 (#156)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Flasho1-mini
LMArena Longer Query14651321

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61), o1-mini: 48.6 (#196)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-Flasho1-mini
LMArena Text14591317
LMArena Creative Writing14081244
LMArena Multi-Turn14601314
Short-Story Creative Writing—64.9%
LiveBench Language—40.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than o1-mini?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or o1-mini better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and o1-mini share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper