Model comparison

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs WizardLM-2 8x22B

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#49); WizardLM-2 8x22B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

WizardLM-2 8x22B Microsoft

31.4

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 28.9.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.62 / $0.62 for WizardLM-2 8x22B.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 66K.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and WizardLM-2 8x22B specifications
MiMo-V2.6-ProWizardLM-2 8x22B
ProviderXiaomiMicrosoft
Noometry Index50.331.4
Released2026-09-212024-04-15
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M66K
Max output131K8K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$0.62
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$0.62
Results tracked192

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProWizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena WebDev1629—
SciCode60.9%—
LMArena Coding1534—
ALE-Bench1,158—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProWizardLM-2 8x22B
APEX-Agents59.5%—

Reasoning Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProWizardLM-2 8x22B
CritPt26.6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1512—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45), WizardLM-2 8x22B: 28.9

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProWizardLM-2 8x22B
ProofBench70%—
LMArena Math1494—
MATH Level 5—25.7%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92), WizardLM-2 8x22B: 23.3

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProWizardLM-2 8x22B
GPQA Diamond—43.4%
LMArena Expert1543—

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProWizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Vision1264—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProWizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Non-English1474—
LMArena Chinese1529—
LMArena Russian1480—

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProWizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Instruction Following1493—

Long Context Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProWizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Longer Query1501—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProWizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Text1492—
LMArena Creative Writing1468—
LMArena Multi-Turn1464—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than WizardLM-2 8x22B?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#49); WizardLM-2 8x22B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or WizardLM-2 8x22B?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; WizardLM-2 8x22B lists at $0.62 and $0.62.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 66K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and WizardLM-2 8x22B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19 scored results on Noometry and WizardLM-2 8x22B has 2.

Related comparisons

Go deeper